Lennart Regebro wrote at 2005-9-21 08:18 +0200: > ... >> What is the "aq_parent" that was used when wrapping the object? > >Eh, which one? The aq_chain of both the original aq wrapper and the >indexableobjectrapper is correct. The aq_chain of the "outside" >aq_wrapper is just [<self>]. Which seems expected, since aq_acquire >think it got an object without acquisition, right?
Depending of what "<self>" is. When an acquisition wrapper is formed, there always must some context (which is put into "aq_parent"). Almost all contexts contain a full acquisition chain. Maybe, we should wrap the "IndexableObjectWrapper" into the context of the catalog? > ... >> Where does the context come from used when "aq_acquire" acquisition >> wrapped the "IndexableObjectWrapper"? > >I don't think there is any context involved. When an acquisition wrapper is formed, there is a context -- the one put as "parent" argument of the acquisition wrapper constructor. >> The best way around such problems would probably by to make >> "IndexableObjectWrapper" a public class. > >"Public"? Yes, public (to let all security checks succeed). Of course, this means that someone with the permission to customize a catalog can obtain information he may not gain in a different way. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )