Stephan Richter wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > At least no one is expecting to make such big changes by yourself. Being > > stubborn and refusing to do further contributions, be they large or small, > > isn't going to get us anywhere. The people who are so far backing up this > > proposal have nothing but support to offer and you know that. > > I am as stubborn refusing this proposal as you are pushing it.
I'm defending my case and trying to answer everybody's concerns. I think that's something that always happens with controversial proposals and it's definitely different than your saying "I will always vote -1 on such a move." (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/9819). > Right now there > are more -1 votes than +1 votes. Maybe it is time retract the proposal? It's been out there less than 24 hours. Let's not be hasty. Jim, for one, hasn't said anything yet. > Furthermore, I have yet to see contributions for Zope 3 from people using > Five. We are not even getting bug reports. Let me refresh your memory about some contributors: Julien, Martijn, Yvo, Florent, Tres, etc. are all Zope 3 contributors coming from a Zope 2 background. Regarding bugfixes, it was the Five people, most notably Yvo, who made a bugfix of the X3 3.0 release line possible. Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )