Benji York wrote: >> Good point. There's the question: Does this "zed" thing need a different >> name at all? If we want other people to pick it up, then it seems like a >> good idea to distinguish it from Zope-the-app-server. Paul seems to >> suggest that in his response. >> >> How about zopelib? > > If we want people outside of the zope community to use these components, > they should not have the word "zope" anywhere in their name. If it says > "zope" people will *always* assume it is for use only with/inside Zope > (Zope 2 more often than not). > > I've seen this when I've told people about testing their web apps with > zope.testbrowser. Their first response is invariably "oh, I can't use > that; I'm not using Zope." > > Therefore, whatever the bag-o-components is named it should not contain > "zope". "Z" or "zed" would be OK with me (especially if we could come > up with some decent domain names that are still available).
I agree. zopelib was just a compromise for the people who like to keep the "zed" thing somewhat associated with Zope-the-project whereas we don't want this to be associated too closely with Zope-the-application-server for the reasons you state above. In the end the question is where we draw the line in all of this. Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
