-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rocky Burt wrote: > On Tue, 2006-28-03 at 08:58 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > >>Chris McDonough wrote: >> >>>-1... Five 1.2 has quite a few differences from Five 1.0 that would stop >>>products written for Five 1.0 from working properly. I've not gone to >>>2.9 on a few projects for this reason (sticking with 2.8). 2.9 is where >>>the new version belongs, IMO. >> >>Out of curiosity, what are the incompatibilities between Five 1.0 and >>1.2/1.3 that hinder you from upgrading? > > > I'd be extremely eager to know the answer to this myself as I've moved a > few production sites from Five 1.0 to 1.2 without breaking any existing > functionality.
The point is that people who *want* Five 1.2 can have it, merely by installing it in their instance homes; folks who don't want to do the testing should not be required to assume risks on behalf of those who have a perfectly viable way to upgrade Five if they need it. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEKVzR+gerLs4ltQ4RAjIJAJ90/vTVLgnc+Mmx3ghZUnekSKI3gwCg1Mm8 hmxU6mVxjDqVdqIm1C89IMg= =7FyL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
