Previously Martijn Faassen wrote: > Christian Theune wrote: > >Martijn Faassen schrieb: > [snip] > >>It's a clear DRY violation, the name of the package (and even the > >>version number) repeats here. > > > >It's not clear to me that it's a DRY violation (see my argument that > >those functions are actually orthogonal). > > The rule for the most common use case is now: > > If you want to develop a package, add it to 'develop' *and* create a > versions section if it doesn't exist, let the 'versions' line in > [buildout] point to it, and add the "package_name = " to it. > > I see a repetition in the package name here. You list it in two places. > I think that's a DRY violation given that wanting a package listed in > develop to be picked up is the most common use case.
That highly depends on how you work. I normally do not pin to exact revisions but to ranges, which work just fun with dev eggs. If you don't want to pin something - remove the pin. Don't expect something to magically make your pin go away. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )