Martijn Faassen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You mean the review of RestrictedPython? > > Yes. > > If RestrictedPython is to be reviewed for changes, it *might* be > easier to do this for 2.4 -> 2.5 instead of the big leap of two python > versions. This depends a bit on how such a review is structured.
It should be easier to never officially support Python 2.5, though. We do want to end up at supporting Python 2.6 in the end. I doubt that the review work of Python 2.4 -> 2.5 plus 2.5 -> 2.6 is smaller than the Python 2.4 -> 2.6 work. If it is easier doing this internally without having to support the intermediate result should still be less work. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
