Lennart Regebro wrote: [snip] > Sure. But that doesn't mean a steering group is the right solution.
Why not? What do you think is the right solution? I can see a number of alternatives: * a pope that has the leadership role. We had Jim, but the pope's resting. We could institute a new pope. Who? * a small team of people, let's say 2 to 5 that takes on that leadership role, sharing some of the burden and representing a slightly wider range of interests. A steering group. * a voting system. The current system of +1 or -1 from anybody who bothers to reply isn't very effective in my experience; in any controversial discussion the opinions are so mixed nothing tends to happen, or alternatively people just avoid discussions and do things without discussions. Solutions proposed that are harder to understand might get ignored. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )