Paul Everitt wrote: > When I read Martin's post, I had a similar reaction. Namely, that the > convenience of the Uberthing (Plone in this case) will always trump the > desire of packages trying to survive on their own for new audiences. At > the time of the configuration scolding, I remember thinking: there's > little interest here in Chameleon's goal to be bigger than Zope. "Keep > things convenient for us in Plone!"
In this case, you totally misread my post. It broke for all users of zope.component, and I never, once, made the argument that Chameleon was part of Plone or should be driven purely by Plone's needs. I have no such pretentions, nor does anyone else I know, about this, or zope.* or the CMF package or, well, anything that is not expressly part of Plone. That particular discussion is over, though, and I have no interest in having it again. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
