Hey, Dan Korostelev wrote: [snip] > Thinking now. If we want local persistent permissions to be considered > dead and we want to discourage their usage, may be the package should > be called "zope.app.localpermission" then? If so, we could also move > its ZMI views there and forget about that package. :) It's just > because "zope.localpermission" name sounds like "some nice part of > zope framework", but in reality, the functionality provided by the > package is deprecated for use withing _the framework_.
You're right, we shouldn't be calling it zope.localpermission. Perhaps we shouldn't be calling it zope.app.localpermission either though, as this implies this package can be mined for useful bits. But I don't want a naming discussion, so I think we should go for your suggestion now (zope.app.localpermission which also has the ZMI). > But, do we really want it deprecated and dead? May be there's some > nice use cases for it? Anyone? At best right now it can serve as example code on how to accomplish this. I can imagine some kind of mythical future ZMI the Next Generation project that would need this. But we cannot afford to care about such mythical future projects as a community, so we should consider it dead. We'll see the fact that nobody but me answered your question as good evidence for this. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )