Previously Andreas Jung wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 23.03.2009 14:26 Uhr, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > > > This is an important point. As I see it the KGS is a Zope-only thing, > > and is just a workaround for the mindless behaviour of setuptools. I do > > not see it gaining acceptance outside of the Zope community, and imho > > effort is better spent on improving the packaging tools. > > > > Are there other Python projects that have to deal with such a huge > amount of packages and dependencies? I don't know any similar project. > So the solution must come from the Zope world (which does not mean that > we participate in the packaging toolchain development as Tarek does).
I don't know. I just feel quite strongly that improving the packaging tools would be a better use of manpower than working on the KGS in its current form. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
