Martijn Faassen wrote: > Hey, > > Okay, in the interests of making this discussion go quickly, there has > been enough negative feedback about renaming Zope 2 to think we have no > realistic chance of renaming it. > > We are still stuck with the following perceived sequence: > > Zope 2, Zope 3 > > which implies that people should want to upgrade.
Does it? There's precedence for systems where n and n+1 does not represent a linear upgrade path. The '3' says more "if you're starting afresh, this is where you want to start". I think that's still a correct statement. > If we don't call Zope Framework "4.0", we'll be fine. We should call its > first release 1.0 and there's no implication of a progression. Yes. For the love of God, please don't call "the Zope Framework" 4.0! Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
