On Sunday 19 April 2009, Tres Seaver wrote: > -1. As a branding choice (as opposed to a technology), "Zope 3" *is* a > dead-end: it implies a strategy (replacing Zope 2) which we no longer > believe in. I think the consequences of the brand confusion are hard > for those uf us "inside" to estimate, but they are far from trivial.
I never communicated to anyone that I believe that Zope 3 is a successor of Zope 2. Other people pushed that message. > Continuing to "push" that brand is confusing to outsiders, who don't > understand why anyone would still be using "Zope 2" four years after the > first release of "Zope 3". The folks who are using "Zope 3" can > certainly cope with a split / rename. That's easy for you to say, since you have no vested interest. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
