Hey, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > This is part of the whole named template adapter story. The rationale > for the whole story is to be able to replace the template of a view > without touching the view. So the template is looked up as an adapter > and not just accessed as self.index / self.template. Personally I find > the whole feature just annoying and overcomplicated. I think the whole > feature is due for removal. It's only used in a very minor number of > cases and not consistently with views in general.
Could you comment on the discussion I've had with Michael Howitz elsewhere in this thread about this then? I think this relates to the whole z3c.template and zope.formlib discussion. [suggestion to invert the dependency between zope.formlib and zope.app.form] Ah, great minds... Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
