> GAE users and repoze.bfg users as repoze.bfg doesn't use zope.security at all
I did a quick grep and it appears that repoze.bfg never actually loads zope.component.zcml so I think if the only dependancies you introduce are via zcml then you should be ok. And given I am running repoze.bfg on app engine it would seem to confirm this ;-) T On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Lotze <t...@gocept.com> wrote: > Thomas Lotze wrote: > >> I thought about that one briefly, but I don't like it because it >> introduces at least some knowledge about the security concept to >> zope.component. > > The more I think about it, the less evil this appears to me, though. After > all, the zope.component.zcml module has been dependent on zope.security > all along (requiring one to install zope.component [zcml] which pulls in > zope.security if one wanted to use it). I think I'd be willing to use > zope.security optionally for the site stuff provided that we can get the > GAE users to agree and with the intention of cleaning up things later > according to those old comments in the code which I mentioned previously. > > -- > Thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Zope-Dev maillist - zope-...@zope.org > https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) > _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )