Christian Theune wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/25/2009 02:35 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: >> Chris McDonough wrote: >>> I think it makes sense. If we can relax the "utility name must be a string" >>> restriction it would be the best solution I think. >>> >>> I'll see what I can do. >> I've decided to keep the components subclass which inherits from dict. > > Just for clarification as I'm confused now from reading the > back-and-forth-maybe-lets-not-play-together stuff all at once: that > means you're going down an incompatible route rolling your own > convenience mechanism?
Yes, unfortunately. At least that's the current plan. - C _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
