Hi!
Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:43 PM, yuppie <y.2...@wcm-solutions.de> wrote: >> Why not following the normal procedure? At some point in the past we >> decided to add formlib support to Zope 2. That's a commitment. We should >> not drop features just like that. > > I think five.formlib is better served by being a separate distribution > that can evolve on its own, much like we do it with > five.localsitemanager. I don't understand this as dropping the > support, but as shifting the maintenance to a different group. Both > CMF and Plone use formlib today and have both come up with additions > and new features for it. I want those to go into five.formlib. Having > the code in Zope2 seems to prevented people from doing so. > > On the other side many people in the Plone community have started > using z3c.form instead of formlib and it looks like all of Plone will > shift to that. Exactly. And I expect CMF will also switch to z3c.form. > Once that happens I don't want to have formlib to still > be there as a dependency of Zope2 for all eternity. Agreed. I did just argue against the fast removal Tres proposed. But five.formlib will only evolve for a short period. Soon it will become a pure legacy package. Nothing we want to recommend for new projects. And in the long run five.formlib and its non-ZTK dependencies will become unmaintained. Cheers, Yuppie _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )