Am 23.04.2010 um 15:19 schrieb Tres Seaver: [...] > Thanks for pointing out that directive, whose existence I had forgotten. > Assuming we put the 'redefinePermssion' directives in place on the > trunk, why shouldn't we leave the version number as is? I consider the > rename a bugfix, not a feature, and if we make it backwared compatible, > there is no reason to bump the major version.
When it is fully backwards compatible I do not see a reason to bump the major version. Otherwise it is required according to the ZTK steering group decisions[1]. [1] ... http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/steeringgroup/decisions.html (sorry, there is no anchor for the list item I mean) Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
