On 7/14/10 16:43 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/14/10 16:28 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> On 7/14/10 16:19 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >>> Log message for revision 114741: >>> - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no >>> specific listening IP is configured for the HTTP server, do a >>> socket lookup to show the current server's fully qualified name. >> >> Can I object to this change? I would much rather always see the IP >> address than just the hostname since that is a lot more information. If >> we change this can we please make it show both IP and hostname? > > Hi Wichert, > > The IP makes no sense, because 0.0.0.0 is strictly speaking correct as > the IP value, since the process is listening on all interfaces. At that > point we have no progress at all. 0.0.0.0 doesn't tell the viewer > anything about what server it came from, either.
I don't mind doing this for a SERVER_NAME in the response, but looking at the diff from the commit email you also changed the startup message from Zope 2 with this change. That is the bit I find problematic: I want to be able to immediately see if the Zope instance is bound to a specific IP address or ANY/0.0.0.0. Wichert. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )