On 20 March 2011 13:46, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: > I think we ought to come up with a much cleaner way of defining > default configuration. (Pyramid does this by passing default values in > adapter calls, but I think we can do a lot better than that.) I'd > like to see us come up with a "pythonic" way to wire components up > that can be overridden through registration (through zcml or > otherwise). Ideally, the mechanism shouldn't "feel" like > "configuration" but like "programming".
You mean like http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grokcore.component http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grokcore.view http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grokcore.viewlet http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grokcore.security ? Martin _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
