* 2011-06-12 22:49, Chris McDonough wrote: > This seems slightly inconsistent with the adaptation worldview imposed by > getAdapter/queryAdapter. I think it would be more consistent if > "c.queryAdapter(IFoo, foo)" returned foo if foo already implemented IFoo > and there was no other more specific adapter registered for the IFoo/foo > pair in the registry, no?
+1, way more consistent than returning None. Regards, Fabio _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
