On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote: > On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting<ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: >> So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or >> 5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the >> most sensible one :) > > > Boy, that's going to be confusing. :) > > I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with the > defunct Zope 3, although I don't think there are any particularly good > options here.
I actually think it's a brilliant idea to "skip" 3.0 and call it 4.0. As Martin said, the potential for confusion is very high. A 4.0 would not only steer around confusing Zope3 3.x and Zope2 3.x, it would also make it easier to move back to the simple "Zope" moniker without any qualifying number tacked on. People who only look at version numbers would now choose Zope 4.0 instead of falling into the "unmaintained" Zope3 trap. jens _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
