* Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> [2011-08-30 09:25]: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring <w...@gocept.com> wrote: > > My understanding is that from a client's perspective these two are > > equivalent: if you want the foo functionality for zope.component, you > > have to depend on zope.component[foo], and you import stuff from > > zope.component.foo. > > Except that probably many (most?) clients of zope.component don't > bother to name the extras because they depend on the other > dependencies anyway, for other reasons.
Yes, right, I see that now. Thanks for clarifying! Hmm, I guess I'm going to lose if I try to argue that not naming the extra is "wrong" and thus deserves no respect or compatibility protection, am I not? Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Schnerring · w...@gocept.com · software development gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 219401 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Python, Pyramid, Plone, Zope - consulting, development, hosting _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
