On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:13:37PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:42:35PM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: > > On 12/19/2012 01:57 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > > Would it be possible to release zope.security 4.0.0 any time soonish? > > > Then new buildouts would get new zope.proxy and new zope.security, > > > while old buildouts would happily continue to use old ones. > > > > I had hoped that the 4.0.0 marker would signal Py3k compatibilty, but > > don't have gumption to finish that port today. > > Whoops. I think I accidentally stepped on your toes by releasing > zope.pagetemplate 4.0.0 without first checking if the Py3k port was > complete. I just assumed it was, after noticing the 4.0.0 version > number in CHANGES.txt.
I added a tox.ini and 'setup.py test' support to zope.pagetemplate trunk and saw that Py3k porting is blocked by zope.security not working with Py3k yet. No pressure ;-) > > Maybe a 3.9.0 release, > > made by branching from 3.8.3 and just bumping the zope.proxy dependency? > > That sounds reasonable. Call that a +0.5 vote, because I don't trust my judgment. Marius Gedminas -- Software programmers should not think that they have to write multi-threaded programs. It's too hard, and the payoff is too little. And it absolutely isn't where the industry is even going. -- Linus Torvalds
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )