On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/10/2013 10:42 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: >> I am in favor of removing the trunks. People who do not want to switch >> to git can still get the trunk by pinning to a specific revision. I >> run a CI tool and it is broken already because apparently a trunk has >> been deleted already. Thats not a bug, thats why I run the CI Tool. >> Would be stupid if I continue to test a trunk not in use. > > It isn't just CI: people may have projects running from SVN checkouts, > which we break without warning (the Plone devs have been notorious for > causing such breakage for years).
I still think breakage is better. If they're using trunk, without pinning a revision, it must be because they want the latest code. They won't get that from svn. This is a case where I think it's better to fail in an obvious way. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
