Not a good reason, just laziness -- basically our app is deployed in two pieces, and it's easier to write the installer for the piece containing zope.proxy if you don't need to worry about the extension module. Actually, that's only true for our Win32 target. Just thought I'd check before spending the time with the build script.
NRY On 8/18/05, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/18/05, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We're using some of the Zope libraries for non-Zope apps, and need to > > include zope.proxy. We're not at the point where we care about > > performance (well, much), so it would make life easier if we had a > > Pure Python version of zope.proxy. Has anyone created such a > > Is there some reason you can't use the C version? > > It's very difficult to write a thorough proxy in Python. > > > -Fred > > -- > Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> > Zope Corporation > _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
