I couldn't disagree more. Moving Zope3 off of Zope.org is a big mistake. Zope 3 is part of Zope is it not? Shouldn't it be on that website?
It just seems silly and short-sighted to try to break out one from the other, when all Zopes (1/2/3......10/11/12) belong on that one website. Wasn't that the point of moving CMF back from cmf.zope.org? Why not spend the time and energy making Zope.org a better place than just moving it off to yet another under-developed and utilized website? My $.03 Jake -- http://www.ZopeZone.com Benji York said: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> b) It is exactly the opposite of what we've been trying to do for the >> last couple of months: convergence, not divergence! > > I think that differentiating Zope 3 from Zope 2 is a good thing. > >> If we want Zope 3 and its Component Architecture to be recognized by >> people, it needs to be a first class citizen on zope.org, not some >> separate site. > > Nothing says that zope3.org can't be prominently displayed on zope.org. > >> Why? Because Zope 2 will soon incorporate lots of Zope 3 technology >> (it already does incorporate some), > > I would posit that there are *many* non-Zope 2 users, and that is a > group we need to attract. Too closely associating Zope 2 and Zope 3 > will only inhibit that. > >> making it all look like two separate worlds is far from reality. > > I'm more interested in promoting Zope 3 than having web site structure > reflect reality. > -- > Benji York > Senior Software Engineer > Zope Corporation > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-dev mailing list > Zope3-dev@zope.org > Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/jake%40zopezone.com > > _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com