Roger Ineichen wrote: > Btw, do we really count developer where are voting but never > contributed to the z3 trunk? I think normaly yes. But this is a > proposal where I think should be up to the Zope3 developer > to decide.
Uh, why only Zope3 developers? This affects the whole Zope community! Really, I'm quite tired of trench wars like Zope 2 vs. Zope 3. Like Martijn said, we need to come together, not apart. I'm starting to get the feeling that some Zope 3 developers rather see Zope 2 die than embrace some of its experience and community. May I remember everyone again that we once said we'd do something about the transition (we even boldly called it "backward compatability" back then, but even I thought that this was quite too unrealistic). So far, nobody from Zope 3 has done anything in that direction, it's always been left to the Zope 2 people. Don't take me wrong, I'm not accusing, it naturally developed that way. But now that Zope 2 people want to join efforts, the Zope 3 developers close the gates under the excuse of saving their "early adoption" investment? > Again, the base idea isn't that bad at all. But since no Zope3 > develper will support it, it will be a bad idea to force it. I'm a Zope 3 developer. Martijn is too. Don't jump to premature conclusions :). Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
