Martijn Faassen wrote: > I want to evolve ZCML as it is right now, this might mean removing > directives, changing directives, consolidating directives, adding > directives, removing some namespaces, consolidating some namespaces, > even adding some namespaces.
Fair enough. I'm already looking forward to your suggestions! > I think we are at a point in evolution where we want to focus on removal > and consolidation. In general, ZCML is ready for a careful rethink. I > agree we should do such a rethink focused on simplification. > > That doesn't mean that I think we should remove the ability to add > directives I never said I wanted to limit ZCML's extensibility mechanism. > or namespaces; I think that is removal gone too far. I think > there are legitimate use cases for both abilities. > > I think that this position is quite consistent. :) Sure, it's consistent. It also lacks a bit meat :). Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com