Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:56:54 -0000, Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before this merge goes through, I would propose the following steps:
Take the document and edit it so it's a clear guide for what you
should do with broken directives. I.e. for browser:localUtility we
want to exactly specify what needs to be done to register this with the
normal content directive.
After that, this document needs to be checked in under the
doc directory.
Finally, there needs to be a clear pointer in at least the changelog as
well as the release notes to this document.
Is there a DTD or XML Schema for the core ZCML namespace(s)? If not, I
think this should happen at the same time, and I'd suggest it be
appropriately annotated to serve as documentation. Interfaces aren't
just for python code :)
Feel free to submit a patch. I'd recommend using Relax NG for this. It
shouldn't be too hard to deduce a Relax NG schema from the information
that's already in the code - ZCML directives have Zope schema definitions.
Anyway, I wouldn't feel that this is a requirement for Philipp's
changes. Good communication about what changed is, in my opinion.
Regards,
Martijn
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
