-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Chris Withers wrote: > >>The implicit change to make them all 64-bits which results in some >>unknown slowdown for all "I" BTree users seems a bit too scary to bite >>off... > > > Has anyone done any benchmarks to prove that 64-bits is slower or > faster? It would be interesting to see benchmarks on modern 32bit > and a 64bit systems. Until then it's all hand-waiving.
Sure, but the "burden of proof" needs to be on the party proposing the cnange. "First, do no harm" is a good principle in such cases. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFERpCv+gerLs4ltQ4RAuoIAJ9fKveUfI54DtYWnD9pWDudhqf5LACgmZu1 GFD9FgvQDR9BdvIyTpIm2tI= =QgmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com