On 4/23/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is using a convenience base class really that much more complexity for > the user? It's perhaps a little more typing, but it gives you less magic > in return. Less magic is less complexity in a way.
Depends on what you mean with "convenience class". I don't mind convenient classes. But if I really need to create one class that does nothing except server as a placeholder for each of my pagetemplates, I wouldn't call that convenient. ;) > So, basically, register pages and all other adapterish things with an > <adapter /> directive? Fine by me :). Pretty much yes. > ... hence the compromise :) Yup. And it seems the compromise was worse than the problem. ;) As Calvin sais: "A good compromise leaves everybody mad". -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com