Hi Philipp [...] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'm working on removing BBB warnings of our current app for 3.3. > >> For the <vocabulay> directive it was possible to give the factory > >> some parameters like this: > >> > >> <vocabulary > >> name="doctype" > >> factory="..vocab.ContainerVocabulary" > >> containerName="doctype" /> > >> > >> Now, with the <utility> directive that's not possible. > > > > Write a own factory like: > > > > class DocTypeContainerVocabulary(ContainerVocabulary): > > > > def __init__(self): > > super(DocTypeContainerVocabulary, self).__init__() > > self.containerName = 'doctype' > > > > and also you have to *patch* your class with : > > > > classProvides(DocTypeContainerVocabulary, IVocabularyFactory) > > This is unnecessarily complicated. Simply do: > > class DocTypeContainerVocabulary(ContainerVocabulary): > containerName = 'doctype' > zope.interface.classProvides(IVocabularyFactory)
right, that's simpler than my sample. > Btw, the "classProvides" thing isn't "patching". Not sure > what you mean, Roger, but it looks like you wanted to give > this a negative connotation. Ok, sorry that wasn't the target of the word *patching*. But sure I'm not really happy with the additional python code where we have to write and it smells to me like a monky patch pattern if use classProvides outside of the class definition. Your example is much better in this part. Regards Roger Ineichen _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
