Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
What I meant: Since is we have things like zope.paste which work fine as
3rd party packages already, perhaps the Zope 3 core just needs to
*support* this separation of server configuration and application
definition, but doesn't necessarily need to *do* it.
True.
Why named? If only so you can register many of them, then I call
yagni. Like a unix file system, a zope instance should only have one
root :-)
Sure. But the use of named utilities would make it a tad easier because
you wouldn't need ZCML overrides.
Let's say Zope 3 defines an IRootObjectFactory utility called
'zope.app.appsetup'. So, a default zope.conf would look like this:
# root-object-factory -- name of an IRootObjectFactory utility that the
# publication will use to create the root object.
#
# Default: root-object-factory zope.app.appsetup
Why would this be in zope.conf at all?
I would have thought just having a normal zcml setup for a single,
global IRootObjectFactory utility would be fine...
Also, why the factory? Why not just IRootObject?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
