Hi Michael > Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: WebDAV Future
[...] > > zwebdavext.zopelocking, zwebdavext.zopefile - extensions > This I like, but renaming zwebdavext -> zwebdavapp :-) This > allows a clearer seperatation between the protocol components > and the application components, which is what want now that I > think about it. > > For example zwebdavext.zopefile isn't really an extension but > more integration code for zwebdav and any application which > uses zope.file. Then in the future I can hopefully get to > work on zwebdav.dasl, zwebdav.acl etc. which are extensions > to the protocol and hence should belong in zwebdav with more > coresponding integration modules in zwebdavapp. Why this complex naming? I really like to see a namespace package called z3c.webdav and use sub packages like: z3c.webdav.file z3c.webdav.acl If this doesn't fit for distribution, buildout or eggs, or other things I missed, why not: z3c.webdav z3c.webdavfile z3c.webdavacl But anyway that's up to you, I'm sure you will do it right and I like your work anyway ;-) Sorry if I missed something, I didn't read all the full thread. Regards Roger Ineichen [...] > Thanks, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-dev mailing list > Zope3-dev@zope.org > Unsub: > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/dev%40projekt01.ch > > _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
