Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2007-04-27 02:43:10 +0200, "Fred Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
Since I expect the "giant checkout" to rapidly fall out of favor, I'm
all for moving code to the satellite projects. Then "Zope 3" will be
free to become a swarm of nano-projects that can be assembled into
useful but also lean and maintainable applications. Which is what we
really care about.
Yes! I'd very much like that. That makes it also easier to get the
dependencies right.
+1 from me. One of the main things stopping me doing zope 3 development
is the need to do a monster checkout.
Of course, the only slightly risk is that when you change a satellite
project, you cause test breakage in other satellite projects. How do
people feel about that?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
