Jim Fulton wrote: > Roger Ineichen wrote: >> Hi Ricki >> >> On Behalf Of GMane >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 5:52 PM >>> To: zope3-users@zope.org >>> Subject: [Zope3-Users] pluggable authentication utility >>> >>> Hi, >>> I have a simple question about pluggable authentication. >>> >>> I created a folder and I made it a site. >>> In the default Site-Management Folder I created a Pluggable >>> Authentication Utility (named plaut). >>> Inside it I made a PrincipalFolder (Partner) and added a user soc1. >> >> >> Don't give a name (plau). Pluggable authentication utilities >> are as dfault unnamed. All components right now will lookup the >> PAU with name=''.
The PAU registration doesn't accept a name. He's likely talking about the PAU's name itself, which can be anything. > For 3.2, we need to find a way to make this clearer. Either we need > to provide a more verbose description of what the name is for or > perhaps, as Stephan has suggested, for components that are always > looked up without names, we should not provide the option of entering > a name and, for others, we should require a name. IMO, the PAU pattern of not taking a name works well. The confusion above may be a hold-over from the time when PAU regs did accept names. -- Garrett _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users