I think we will probably proceed on trying to make a MySQL adapter that can replace GadFly -- hopefully possible and not TOO much work. I think that and a better SQL container (maybe sqlos) would solve our issues, as well as be a great benefit to Zope.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jim Fulton > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 10:06 AM > To: Jeff Rush > Cc: zope3-users@zope.org > Subject: Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities > > Jeff Rush wrote: > ... > > I've always wondered why ZODB didn't offer an option of storing the > > object index in a BTREE, but I guess its the performance issue of > > potential additional disk accesses. > > This was one of the benefits of the Berkeley DB storage. Sadly, > we put a lot of work into the BDB storage and people didn't seem > to care that much. That, and the grief we got from Berkeley DB > itself made us drop the effort. I do still think it has a lot > of potential. > > We could make the file-storage index management more sophisticated, > but I'd really rather find something like the Berkeley database that > we could build on. > > Jim > > -- > Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! > CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org > Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-users mailing list > Zope3-users@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users