On 2/14/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Wedig wrote: > > I'm in the planning stages for developing a Zope 3 application. It > > would be nice to know my http caching plan ahead of time. It seems > > that the two main options are squid and apache. I was wondering if the > > most flexible setup might be to have apache running behind squid, and > > zope behind apache. > > My personal preference is apache -> squid -> zope > > But that's 'cos I like Apache's rewriting and have more faith in it as a > front-end proxy for sanitizing requests and the like... > That's very interesting. If you understood Squid better do you think you'd leave out apache? Or perhaps that not the issue at all for you. I'm asking because in my company we've lots of apache experience but less so in squid. It's therefore a potential security risk to leave out apache.
And what about the performance overhead? Any experience you can share? > cheers, > > Chris > > -- > Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting > - http://www.simplistix.co.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-users mailing list > Zope3-users@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users > -- Peter Bengtsson, work www.fry-it.com home www.peterbe.com hobby www.issuetrackerproduct.com _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
