In my interface I have Bool fields, say e. g. for invitation class IAdr(Interface) ... invitation = Bool( title=u'Invitation', description=u'Invitation?', required=False ) ...
Now when rendering the following edit-form class AdrEditForm(form.EditForm): fields = field.Fields(IAdr) ... I get radio-boxes for invitation like so: (*) yes ( ) no (by the way: this can also been seen in z3c.formdemo on the "All widgets" page widgets.html) Well nice - after all this reflects the behaviour of boolean values: they can be either yes (True) or no (False). Actually I preferred formlibs behaviour of rendering checkboxes for Bools though, something like: [v] I. e. a single checkbox that can either be checked [v] or not [ ] should suffice for a boolean value. - This is shorter than the radio buttons and just as good. Now I was hoping that this was implemented in z3c.form.browser.checkbox already: class AdrEditForm(form.EditForm): fields = field.Fields(IAdr) def MyFieldWidget(field, req): return widget.FieldWidget(field, checkbox.CheckBoxWidget(req)) fields['invitation'].widgetFactory = MyFieldWidget However I get *two* checkboxes now [ ] yes [ ] no for the one boolean field invitation - that's not exactly what I was looking for: *one* checkbox should be enough for a Bool field - and what should happen by the way, if I check both boxes ([v] yes [v] no)? I think there should be an easy way to do this. This is very common after all. - Any hints? Have I overlooked something? -Andreas _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users