Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Scott Parish wrote:
> > I'm not entirely clear how
> > asking the object to delete itself in this case is going to improve the
> > situation over just asking the rack to, but I think that was the intent.
>
> Okay, I see the intent now too, but I agree with you that I can't see
> what advantage asking the object to delete itself provides. Could
> someone explain please?
>
> Furthermore, even if there was an advantage to this, why can't the
> rack's delete method just be piped through to the object's delete
> method? (which I thought was common practice with Specialists)
>
> cheers,
What happens when the object is in multiple racks?
(Assuming it is possible)
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
