> Chris McDonough wrote:
> >
> > Yes. Thank you.
> >
> > Note however that methods of modules accessed via the underscore namespace
> > may be filtered individually, so although 'replace' exists as a method of
> > the Python string module, this does not necessarily make it accessible
> > implicitly through Zope via _.string.replace. It happens to be accessible
> > in this case, but I'd bet there are cases in which methods accessible
> > via modules of the _ namespace have been removed for "safe scripting"
> > purposes.
>
> having recently gone through the code to produce ZModules (defined
> interface for adding modules to _), it was apparent that all the modules
> that live in namespace are completely exposed.
What's the problem with that? Aren't most, if not all, the modules living
in the _ namespace just standard python modules available anyways?
Knight
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
