David Pratt wrote at 2005-9-22 17:50 -0300: > ... >I am interested in what you might recommend when you are dealing with a >number of virtual sites of the smaller zodb scale since this is really >the issue I am attempting to solve. I definitely like the features ZEO >has to offer as far as asynchronous maintenance, etc.
I have no experience with this. My experience is with huge ZODB storages -- containing everything, even large binary objects. It copes quite well. How to proceed with lots of small virtual sites heavily depends on your ressources. If I had plenty of resources, I would each give its own Zope instance -- to make then as independent from one another as possible. If my resource were very tight, I would use a single Zope instance and a single storage to spare resources as much as possible. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
