Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
hmm, could i please have a comment on my real question? is it correct,
to expect the abovementioned retval from strftime in this case?
if so, i'll change the testcase and fix the two outstanding issues
with dates <1900 or >2035 and open a collector issue with the patches
included.
My point was that no, I can't comment on your real question. Too many
people just dive in and change things so the tests pass without really
looking closely at what they're doing. This is likely how DateTime got
to be such a mess in the first place: works for me, must be okay!
It's good to see someone paying some decent attention to this, I just
hope you're paying real close attention and really understand the
problem, 'cos it's a damn hard problem...
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
