On 12/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should be able to
> design stuff incrementally with a little experimentation along the way
> without constantly impending danger of it all crashing down on you.
I don't undertand why you say that this isn't possible in Zope.
> That's how Python works, and RoR etc. In ZOPE, we're back to the
> temptation to "just stuff a bunch of data into my object". And it's
> not even obvious that this is a problem, because everything is so
> tightly interdependent. It's exactly what Python usually avoids
> ("explicit is better than implicit").
I agree that there is too much implicitness in Zope 2. I don't agree
that persistance is a part of that. It isn't implicit at all. Maybe
it's not easy to understand, but it isn't particularily implicit, and
neither is it uncontrollable, as you seem to say.
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
