I think you missed the point. The main reason to ditch it is the fact
that there is no one who is willing and able to support the code for
it in Zope. Just because someone comes up with a combination where
FCGI might have a benefit still does not give us a developer to
support it.
jens
On 21 Dec 2005, at 04:48, David Bear wrote:
could this be one reason to keep fastcgi?
On 12/19/05, Robert Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using
Apache 2.0, and I cannot find a solution to passing the
value of REMOTE_USER from Apache to Zope when using a rewrite rule. I
have Apache rewriting requests for Zope, and hooked into Tomcat with
mod_jk. My users login through a servlet, and Apache has REMOTE_USER
available to it. But any subsequent request to Zope loses this value.
I used to have this all working when using FastCGI, but I'm hoping to
use only mod_rewrite. Is it possible?
Thanks,
Rob
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
--
David Bear
What's the difference between private knowledge and public knowledge?
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
