Well... They were already using Zope's cache and Squid to proxy some static HTML I guess the problem is Plone itself... Skins etc...
On 1/24/06, Sasha Vincic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/24/06, Peter Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/24/06, Hugo Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm responsible for a big corporate intranet and corporate portal. > > > They were using Zope/Plone before I got here and the problems are too > > > many. > > > > > > Let's talk about performance issues... Plone is VERY SLOW responding > > > > > <snip> > > > Yes! > > But not good enough. > > Most performance issues with Plone can be solved by caching. Don't > > underestimate it. > > Yes Plone is slow but with caching you get very good performance. I > have boosted performance on plone sites from default 1-3req/s to > 100req/s and then it was the bandwith that was the bottleneck. The > sites where serving both anonymous and authenticated content. I > recommend to check out the CacheFu product and documentation in the > collective. > > /Sasha > Lovely Systems - www.lovelysystems.com > -- Hugo Ramos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://otugga.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
