-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 30 Sep 2006, at 14:59, Perry Smith wrote:
On Sep 30, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 29. September 2006 15:05:06 -0700 David Bear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know it has been asked many times which os is best for zope, I
have
...snip
smoothly?
Don't depend on packages. It is the safest way to use the source code
distributions. The sources code distro is recommended and
supported. In case of packages you depend often on a single
maintainer.
I was wondering... I'm an old AIX guy and I never pick up pre-
compiled versions of software because the guy who compiles it often
has choices and his choices are not what I want. So I just pick up
and compile what I want/need. That practice has propagated over to
Mac OS X where I do most of my "home" work now.
There's a fine line between the amount of work involved and what it
is that you want to end up "supporting" because you're the one who
built it.
I would never want to build for example my own Apache or Squid, I
rely on distribution-provided packages myself. This guarantees I'll
be up to date most of the time (bug fixes etc) and updates happen
without much effort on my side with the distribution's own update
mechanisms. But Zope, Python and any add-ons to these two I would
never take from the distribution and always compile it myself because
for those I am willing and able to take over "support" myself. Like
you, for those specific packages I don't trust any packagers' choices.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFHnS+RAx5nvEhZLIRAlW2AJ9ziitSXTsI+n7TPGq5PIm0BsBmHQCcCuby
TNV2fNKZ+p8jVqIqhPn3BlQ=
=ZVnS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )