On 8/10/07, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's not a storage at all. > > Really? I'm pretty sure it implements the relevent storage interfaces > otherwise it wouldn't slot in the place of FileStorage...
Just because it implements the interface doesn't make it a storage. It's a stub, a proxy, it passes on > That stub *could* do conflict resolution for client-side connects, I > thought it did, but it looks like it doesn't. How can it? It doesn't have the necessary context. > I'm only talking about having ClientStorage resolve conflict between the > threads of that client, not about propagating conflicts between clients, > that *would* be nuts ;-) But it's the only option the ClientStorage has, as it has no clue about conflicts. Only the ZEO server holds enough context for that, AFAICT. -- Martijn Pieters _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )