Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > >> On Dec 21, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Ross Patterson wrote: > >> Now I've gotta run out of here before a licensing discussion breaks >> out. ;-) > > I suppose this topic is just too volatile, but it would be great to > have some documentation somewhere for developers like myself who don't > really have strongly formed opinions or practices on licensing. I'd > love to have a page I can go to, read the facts, a sampling of the > opinions, all provided just for the purposes of giving developers a > resource for making their own decision.
I'm really a bit embarrassed that I started this thread. All I really wanted was to find or maybe instigate the creation of resources for developers such as myself who want to learn enough about the licenses available to make a choice. I don't want to participate in or instigate a licensing debate. This is not to say I don't think it's worth debating. I think impassioned opinions and debates about licensing are necessary and healthy. It's just not why I started this thread. The amusing thing is much of the most useful information I've gotten has been off list. :) It seems as though a creating an informative resource on licensing in the Zope and/or Plone communities is not possible due to these impassioned opinions. As such, I'd like to to consider that conclusion to be the resolution of this thread. :) Ross _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )