Yep! I have had very good luck with it so far; my little hack that I posted works like a (klutzy) charm and ExtJS is great with zope. The ExtJS folks are very well organized, and the library is quite powerful. It's working great. However, my application doesn't have quite the segregation that yours does; ExtJS and zope (DTML in particular) are much more intermingled, and can't be easily separated. This application is actually a frontend for a Java library that controls instruments at CERN (a research lab I work for), and I love the solution that it has presented. It works like a charm. (in case you're curious, it makes use of a wonderful python library I ran across called JPype (http://jpype.sourceforge.net) to execute the Java code)
I am going to be accessing Zope through apache with the VHM, but there are multiple reasons why I don't want to serve the js through apache. This same principle is the reason that I don't want to upload things through FTP or WebDAV. I'm making a product, and I would like to keep it atomic, i.e., I want the only install procedure to be "copy product folder to instance/Products". Uploading via WebDAV, or hosting the javascript using separate software, defeats that purpose. The solution that Tom proposed (LocalFS) seems to be what I want, but the problem is that I think it is way too out of date; it crashed my zope server (2.10.5) when I installed it. It says nothing can be found after I add an instance through the ZMI, and this is after I fixed a deprecated import ( from OFS.content_types import find_binary -> from zope.app.content_types import find binary). I had to completely remove the product to get my Zope instance to work again. I'm getting the feeling that there isn't really a (recent) canned solution for accessing file system content, which is... strange at best, considering all the power that zope has at its disposal. You would think that accessing the file system would be present just because it is so simple to do. I'm not complaining, as I'm *very* happy with zope, I'm just surprised :). I realize that zope's principle is to store everything in the database, but this is unacceptable for content such as video files, right? I mean the ZODB file would be absolutely humongous (and slow? I don't know for sure how it's implemented). If there isn't already a working solution, I would be happy to come up with one; I could just hack out the parts of LocalFS that work, add a few features, and repackage it into a new product. It's not difficult to do (my little trivial solution already would work fine if I did a non-dumb implementation of the file-serving logic), and as much as I would like to use it for other projects, it would be worth my time. For example, I want to make a little video/music server as a personal project unrelated to my current one, and I really don't want to store things in the ZODB if I can help it... 1 video = +1 gig ZODB? :S I don't know much about zope obviously, so if I get some vehement objections to this route, I'll pick another :) Thanks! -Matt -----Original Message----- From: Tim Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:03 PM To: Tom Von Lahndorff Cc: Matt Hollingsworth; zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] Best Practice for including Javascript in Zope Applications I am writing an application that uses extjs as the front end and zope on the back and they work together really well. I am using a webserver to server the extjs library and everything else comes out of zope. So far I have had no trouble with relative links or files broken up in different locations. It may be because I have fully committed to having an extjs front end. I typically serve a page out of zope, it calls the extjs library as well as custom JavaScript files. The web2.0 style page then makes multiple xhr calls back to zope to load smaller html and json fragments. Works like a charm and has the additional benefit of letting me cache the majority of the front end in the webserver and in the users browser. Have fun because you have just come across a wonderful combination...extjs and zope! Tim On Jan 2, 2008 6:38 AM, Tom Von Lahndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Matt Hollingsworth wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm new to developing for zope, and I have a quick question > > regarding some best practices when using Javascript in zope > > applications. > > > > I would like to use Ext JS (http://www.extjs.com/ ) in an > > application that I am writing. It is a fairly extensive library, so > > I didn't really want to copy/paste every single file into a dtml > > method. I looked all over the place for some discussion on this > > subject, but only found things relating to plone (which apparently > > has a javascript registry); however, I wish to stay away from plone > > for this particular application. > > > > What should I do to use these libraries? Is there a canned solution > > for this sort of thing? > > > > Thank you much! > > > > -Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org > > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > > (Related lists - > > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) > > > You can ftp the files to a "static" directory on the file system and > use LocalFS to access them. > http://wiki.zope.org/zope2/LocalFS__________________________________________ _____ > > Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) > _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )